Claim “Empowered.”

To all you loyal readers out there who are still following after the last few months of less prolific writing, I thank you! With the dawning of the new year, my hope is that I will have more time to blog on 4WomenWorldwide. Until then, thank you for being patient and, as always, thank you for reading.

The SlutWalks

I’ve delayed weighing in on the SlutWalks because I was trying to form my opinion on the movement, though I know that many a feminist ardently supports the cause. For those of you not familiar, it was sparked when a Toronto police officer said that “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order to not be victimized.”

In response, students around the country organized the SlutWalk.  Its objective is two fold: to “reclaim” the word “slut” and demonstrate that women should feel safe to dress as they wish without feeling threatened.

New York City SlutWalk

Objectively, I could not agree more.

The movement is, admittedly, misunderstood by those who only hear the name and don’t read further; however, there are two points that I think the SlutWalks overlook.

1. It’s Not That Simple

There are two fundamental flaws in our society that SlutWalk fails to adequately address:

  • Good Men Rape Women
  • Women Don’t Adequately Protect Themselves

On point one: men are not taught the proper meaning of consent. Lines are grey and, if not properly trained, good men rape women. Often without knowing it.

On point two: given the reality of point one, women need to understand how their behavior plays into this dynamic. This means drawing boundaries, vocalizing desires, and, when necessary, educating men about where the lines are.

These ideas are not without controversy. But they are long-acknowledged facts that boil under the surface of sexual relations in American society. Choosing to simplify this problem into anything less (i.e. women should be able to wear what they want + be left alone = problem solved) ignores the underlying dynamic and allows it to continue.

Yes, women should be able to wear what they want; but what does this matter if men don’t know the meaning of consent, anyway?

2. Reject “Slut.” Claim “Empowered.”

What has always perplexed me about SlutWalks is the desire to reclaim a word that is degrading, misogynist, and coined to be an insult to women. Why would we want such a thing back?

I understand the logic: the Toronto policeman who sparked this movement called women sluts and blamed them for being raped. We need to set the record straight.

But wouldn’t it be more productive to point out the double standard: men who sleep around are heroes while women who do the same are called sluts; or perhaps we could discuss how to educate men and women about the ways in which many women are unwittingly assaulted.

“Slut” is not a compliment; it’s a sexist term, coined by men to insult women. This is not something I want to be called. Ever. Period.

I reject it.

Instead, why don’t we claim something like, “empowered.”

We are empowered to discuss these issues in a way that changes the landscape for our children; we are empowered and we are rejecting the double standard, we are rejecting the fault finding, and we are marching to demand a society that does not deny the true causes of these issues but rather educates its children to change the future.

One thought on “Claim “Empowered.”

  1. I agree with your entire article. I want to point out one thing about guys being called hero/stud and women being called slut. While I was in college, I was a psychology major. And as such, I took a fair number of classes that deal with women, relationships, and a combination of both. According to research, women have the power in initiating a relationship. For example, a normal guy (not drunk or playing the numbers) usually will not approach a woman if there is not a welcoming sign from her. Some minute sign, whether it is a flirtative glance or a smile, is usually required to signal to the guy that the woman is showing interest. And when they actually get enough courage to talk to the woman, the woman have the option to terminate the conversation at any time. When a guy has a high success rate, it is seen as a feat by the male society (“game” if you will). It seems as if the guy has some techniques in talking to women or know how to handle them. And the reason they are seen as a hero or a stud is because it is usually a low success rate for much of the male population to be able to succeed with a woman (let alone multiple women).

    I believe that the reason there is a double standard is because women hold all the power in the initial encounter. If you kind of reverse it, then you can see why men who are successful with multiple partners are idolized in male society. For example, let’s suppose you get to sleep with what Hollywood deem an attractive male actor/Adonis. Say you get to bed Brad Pitt or Ryan Gosling, I am sure you will be seen as a heroine by a lot of women. Because the power has shifted.

    Sorry for rambling. But I just want to point out that the double standard exists and it will never be changed until women start to approach men in bars or coffee shops more often.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s